Friday, July 23, 2021

Toomey Re-Introduces Measure to Make Long-Term Care Insurance More Affordable

Washington, DC – US Senator Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) Reintroduces a bill to make long-term care insurance more affordable. Senator Toomey’s Long-Term Care Affordability Act would allow individuals to live with their 401st Paying up to $ 2,500 for long-term care insurance each year(k), 403(b), and IRAs with no tax penalty.

“The outbreak of a chronic illness that too often requires nursing home or home care has the potential to devastate older Americans financially,” Senator Toomey said. “This legislation allows Americans to use existing retirement accounts to pay for long-term insurance – a change in common sense to increase financial security in retirement. I hope that my colleagues will support this measure together with me. ”

Retirement accounts offer a tax benefit to workers who are now putting money aside for retirement. Advance withdrawals from these accounts are generally treated as income and taxed accordingly. There are exceptions, however. For example 401(k)

Owners may be able to use their retirement account for life insurance with no tax penalty. Senator Toomey’s move would treat long-term care insurance in a similar way.

According to the US Census Bureau, 50 percent of people over the age of 65 require some long-term care, and more than half of American households contribute to retirement savings. All of them would be entitled to pay for long-term care with retirement assets under this law.

The organizations that have approved this law include:

·
Alzheimer’s Association

·
Alzheimer’s Impact Movement

·
America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP)

·
American senior housing association

·
Argentum

·
Edward Jones

·
Long-term care insurance partner

·
National Association of Health Insurance Companies (NAHU)

·
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (NAIFA)

·
National Association of Insurance Commissioners

“Alzheimer’s is a devastating and deadly disease that affects millions of Americans,” said Robert Egge, chief public policy officer for the Alzheimer’s Association and executive director of the Alzheimer’s Impact Movement (AIM). “One of the most costly diseases in the country, for too many American families bearing the cost of caring for a loved one, is a challenge. We thank Senator Toomey for his guidance in reintroducing the Long Term Care Affordability Act. This bill could have a significant impact on families struggling to pay for care by making care insurance more accessible by allowing pension funds to be used to purchase insurance. “

“Argentum is excited to support the Long Term Care Affordability Act to help more Americans plan and meet their long-term care needs,” said James Balda, President and CEO of Argentum. “Unfortunately, one in three Americans has saved less than $ 5,000 for retirement and less than 8% have long-term care insurance. By the end of this decade, each of the 74 million baby boomers will be 65 years old and have a roughly 50% chance of becoming dependent on care at some point in life. As the need for long-term care grows, this legislation provides an extremely important means of ensuring that more Americans have the financial means to meet their care needs. ”

“The need for long-term care insurance is an important issue for aging Americans and their families,” said Janet Trautwein, NAHU CEO. “As this population continues to grow, insurers, policymakers and consumers will need to think seriously about how to plan and manage the costs associated with long-term care needs. NAHU fully supports Senator Pat Toomey’s efforts to make long-term care insurance more accessible and affordable. “

You can read a one-pager on legislation here, and the text of the invoice is available Here.

Background:

In November 2019, Senator Toomey convened the Healthcare Subcommittee of the Senate Finance Committee to address barriers to diagnosis, treatment, and care for Alzheimer’s patients. During that hearing, Senator Toomey outlined the need for this new legislation. You can watch it here.

Following that hearing, Senator Toomey and Senator Debbie Stabenow, Chair and Senior Member of the Subcommittee, sought input by health care providers, researchers, patients, stakeholders, states, and others to update on how this legislation evolves.

###



source https://livehealthynews.com/toomey-re-introduces-measure-to-make-long-term-care-insurance-more-affordable/

Over 2 Million Americans Signed Up for Health Insurance Thanks to Biden Provision

Health insurance can be expensive. Unfortunately, not having it could be catastrophic in the event of a major illness or injury. In fact, people without insurance routinely rack up medical debt, which can, in some cases, destroy their finances or drive them into bankruptcy.

Normally, those wishing to enroll in a health insurance plan under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) can do so from early November through mid-December. Those who miss that window generally have to wait a year before being able to enroll again.

But recognizing the dangers of having so many Americans uninsured during a pandemic, President Biden pushed for better access to healthcare. Earlier in the year, he signed an executive order allowing for a special ACA enrollment period. That period was initially set to run from Feb. 15 through May 15, but it’s since been extended three months to last until Aug. 15.

So far, over 2 million Americans have signed up for health insurance this year as a result of that special enrollment period. And that means a lot of people have taken an important step to protect their personal finances.

One email a day to could help you save thousands

Tips and tricks from the experts delivered straight to your inbox that could help you save thousands of dollars. Sign up now for free access to our Personal Finance Boot Camp.

By submitting your email address, you consent to us sending you money tips along with products and services that we think might interest you. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Please read our Privacy Statement and Terms & Conditions.

The importance of having insurance

Rather than pay for health insurance, some people would rather pay for the occasional doctor appointment or medication out of pocket. This can be cheaper than having to cover certain health insurance costs like:

  • Insurance premiums: the fees you pay to have coverage in the first place
  • Deductibles: the amount you must first pay before your insurance plan starts covering your care

The problem, however, is that if you land in the hospital or require an expensive diagnostic test, like an MRI, not having insurance could mean having to spend thousands of dollars just to take care of yourself. That could force you to deplete your savings account or rack up huge bills that you pay off over time.

As such, if you’re currently without health insurance and you haven’t taken advantage of the new ACA special enrollment window, now’s a good time to get moving. Health insurance may not be as expensive as you think, especially if you’re not a high earner and can qualify for a generous subsidy. Thanks to the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan — the massive relief bill that was signed into law in March — there are more subsidies available to offset premium costs.

As a general rule, healthcare enrollees now won’t have to spend more than 8.5% of their income on insurance premiums. And those earning more than 400% of the federal poverty level — approximately $51,000 if you’re single or $104,800 if you’re a four-person family — are now eligible for a subsidy for the first time.

Among those who have signed up for a new plan since April 1, an estimated 34% were able to find policies that cost $10 or less per month when factoring in those new subsidies.

It’s never a good idea to go without health insurance, but during a pandemic, it’s an even more dangerous thing to do. If you don’t have health insurance, it pays to see what low-cost options may be available to you by visiting healthcare.gov.



source https://livehealthynews.com/over-2-million-americans-signed-up-for-health-insurance-thanks-to-biden-provision/

Contraception Is Free to Women, Except When It’s Not

It has been a struggle for Stephanie Force to find a method of contraception she likes and can get without paying out of pocket, even though the Affordable Care Act promises free contraception for women and adolescent girls in most health plans.

The 27-year-old doctor-recruiter in Roanoke, Virginia, was perfectly happy with the NuvaRing, a flexible vaginal ring that women use monthly to release hormones to prevent pregnancy. But their insurer, Anthem, discontinued coverage of the branded product and switched to a generic version in early 2020. Force said the new product left her with a headache and a feeling of irritability and fussiness.

After speaking to her gynecologist, Force tried an IUD. But it made her feel worse: She had bad cramps, gained 10 pounds, and developed severe hormonal acne. She was also billed $ 248 for an ultrasound that her doctor used to guide the insertion of the device, a fee she successfully tackled.

Force also looked at some of the contraceptives approved in recent years: a non-hormonal vaginal gel called Phexxi and a vaginal ring called Annovera that can be used for a year. But Phexxi isn’t covered by her employer’s health insurance, and she would owe a $ 45 copayment for Annovera.

Despite the ACA’s guarantees of free contraception, Force’s experience shows that even for women whose health plans are regulated by law, getting the right product for free can be a chore. New types of contraception are not automatically added to the state list of required methods that insurers use to make coverage decisions. Additionally, some health plans continue to discourage the use of even long-established methods such as IUDs by requiring providers to obtain approval of the plan before prescribing it.

Consumer advocates who have looked into the issue say that federal regulations provide a procedure for women to get the contraceptive they need, but far too few people know it is an option.

Despite the ACA’s guarantees of free contraception insurance, Stephanie Force found firsthand that getting the right product for free can be a chore. Force says she was not aware of any method she could have used to cover the NuvaRing at no cost. Neither her doctor nor the insurer mentioned the possibility.(Stephanie Kraft)

Ultimately, despite the side effects she continues to experience, Force reverted to the generic version of the NuvaRing. She would prefer to be on the branded NuvaRing, which didn’t cause her any problems, and method-to-method ping-ponging left her exhausted and angry.

“I can’t believe the tires I had to overcome between September 2020 and June 2021,” Force said, “between switching from the generic NuvaRing to the IUD and then back to battle my insurance and the obstetrician’s office over the ultrasound fee. ”

In a statement, Anthem said, “Anthem’s health plans include 222 contraceptives at a cost of $ 0 on our ACA preventive list. We cover at least one product in each of the 18 contraceptive categories that are FDA cleared.

Contraception is a very personal choice, and what meets one woman’s needs cannot meet another. If avoiding pregnancy is a top priority for a woman, a practically fail-safe method like an IUD may be the solution. But for someone considering getting pregnant soon, an easily reversible method like birth control pills might be the best option. Side effects should also be considered, as women react differently to the hormones in different contraceptives.

Before the ACA required free birth control, researchers estimated that up to 44% of women’s health care expenses were spent on contraceptives. The ACA required most commercial health plans to cover a comprehensive list of FDA-approved methods without charging women. Church plans and religious non-profit organizations as well as employers and schools that reject contraception are exempt from the coverage requirement. Plans that existed according to the law are also excluded. Even uninsured women do not benefit from the mandate.

But federal regulations don’t require health plans to cover every contraceptive. Following the adoption by the Court of Auditors in 2010, the Federal Administration for Health Resources and Services developed guidelines for the prevention of women. These guidelines state that women should have free access to a list that includes the 18 FDA-approved methods, including oral contraceptives, vaginal rings and cervical caps, IUDs, implantable rods, and sterilization. According to federal regulations, health insurance must cover at least one product in each category.

But neither the HRSA guidelines nor a birth control table published by the FDA address newer methods, including the Phexxi gel, which regulates the acidity of the vagina to reduce the chances of a sperm reaching an egg. It was approved by the FDA last year.

They also don’t include fertility detection mobile apps that the FDA has approved in recent years, such as Natural Cycles, which track a woman’s temperature and menstrual cycle to help prevent pregnancy.

“There is a real need for new guidelines that keep up with new practices,” said Mara Gandal-Powers, director of birth control access at the National Women’s Law Center.

Many insurers have shied away from insuring Phexxi, said Rameshwari Gupta, director of strategic markets at Evofem Biosciences, which markets Phexxi. A box of 12 disposable applicators – consumers use one before sex – costs $ 267.50 without insurance, she said.

“When I started talking to the payers, they all said, ‘Where are you on this FDA card?'” She said.

According to an FDA spokesman, birth control is for consumer education purposes only and “was not created with the intent to make decisions about coverage.” The agency is in the process of updating it.

In a statement, HRSA said it is reviewing the evidence of contraception and expects to complete its review later this year. If it chooses to revise it, it will publish draft recommendations to update the guidelines for women prevention services. These are finalized after a public comment period and come into force one year later.

At this point, health plans are viewing Phexxi as a spermicide and only need to cover one type of spermicide at no cost, said Kristine Grow, senior vice president at AHIP, a health insurance trading organization.

“If Phexxi is indeed seen as a new ‘method’ of contraception, both the FDA and HRSA would need to make this clear,” she added.

The vaginal ring Annovera, which was approved by the FDA in 2018, is usually covered by health insurance, according to Grow, although it may not be available free of charge. The average sales price according to GoodRx is $ 2,457 per year.

Plans have made it difficult for women to access certain contraceptives, even if they are on the list of approved methods, by requiring their providers to first get approval from the insurer, often by providing evidence that the product is medically necessary.

For example, according to UnitedHealthcare’s insurance policy for Phexxi, members must have documented reasons for not being able to use eight other methods of contraception, including oral contraceptives, the contraceptive patch, a vaginal ring, injections, and spermicides, prior to approval of coverage. Providers must also confirm that they advised patients that Phexxi is less effective at preventing pregnancy than some other methods.

In a statement, UHC said it covers “a wide range” of generic and brand name options and that it is following scientific evidence to develop its list.

However, according to a report by the National Women’s Law Center, consumers have a way to get the drug that is most suitable for them.

If a doctor or other health care provider determines that a patient needs a particular contraceptive even if it is not on the list of approved devices for the patient plan, federal regulations require the insurer to put in place an appropriate process for finding the patient for a waiver.

“It’s not up to the insurance company whether they cover this method; it’s up to the provider, ”said Adam Sonfield, senior editor, policy analysis at the Guttmacher Institute, a research and advocacy organization focused on women’s reproductive health.

But, according to the National Women’s Law Center report, many insurers, patients, and their providers are unaware of the requirement, and government agencies are not enforcing these so-called exemptions.

When patients are having trouble getting the method they want, “we usually recommend filing a complaint with their health insurance company,” said Gretchen Borchelt, vice president of reproductive rights and health at the National Women’s Law Center.

Stephanie Force said she was not aware of any procedure that would allow her to cover the NuvaRing at no cost. Neither her doctor nor the insurer mentioned the possibility.

She recently had an appointment with a new vendor that she hopes will make a better lawyer for her.

Michelle Andrews:
andrews.khn@gmail.com, @ mandrews110

Related topics

Contact us Submit a story tip



source https://livehealthynews.com/contraception-is-free-to-women-except-when-its-not/

Respect athletes’ mental health needs – The Daily Evergreen

When you think of professional athletes, you think of physical health – weights, exercise, protein shakes, and whatever else it takes to keep you in top shape at all times.

What people don’t consider nearly as often is the mental health of athletes.

In order to remain in your maximum physical condition, you must also remain in your maximum mental condition. Given the highly publicized nature of sport, athletes today do not have the opportunity to keep up with their mental health as well as they should.

Japanese tennis player Naomi Osaka is one of the newest athletes to speak out on mental health this Olympic season. In one (n open letter to Time Magazine, she addressed two main issues affecting athletes’ mental health: privacy and lack of days off.

In the Osaka case, privacy had to do with media and press conferences.

On May 30, she was fined $ 15,000 for not attending a press conference at the French Open for reasons of her own mental health. Tournament officials threatened Suspension or even disqualification if Osaka continued to avoid press conferences, Osaka withdrew completely from the competition in an act of defiance and self-love.

Megan Christoferson, Senior Business Management and Hospitality Major, supports Osaka’s actions.

“I think Naomi Osaka had every right to stand up for herself as she did,” said Christoferson. “People who are known to the public keep an eye on them; everything they do is watched and criticized. Struggling with mental health is one thing, but being an athlete or a celebrity in trouble is another thing entirely. “

In her letter, Osaka talked about what it is like to experience mental health problems in public.

“In my case, I felt under a lot of pressure to reveal my symptoms – frankly, because the press and the tournament didn’t believe me,” she wrote.

A statement from tournament officials seemed to support this.

“… The Roland Garros teams asked her to reconsider her position and tried unsuccessfully to speak to her to check her wellbeing, understand the specifics of her problem and what could be done to address it on the ground, ”it said in the statement.

Personally, I find this statement ridiculous. Osaka should never have been required to disclose their specific symptoms or medical history in order for their decision to be respected.

Alayna Marsh, Senior Psychology and Human Development Major, agrees. Marsh believes that anything a person finds necessary for their own mental health is their best option. Nobody else can tell.

“I can definitely say, only as a psychiatrist / HD person … not only should [athletes] advocate for their own mental health, but they should also have their coaches and their people with them who should do the same, ”Marsh said.

In her open letter, Osaka thanked the people in her life who supported her mental health as well as her business partners. She thanked them for their support, encouragement, and understanding, and reminded readers of the importance of such support systems.

However, despite all the support in the world, it is impossible to take care of your mental health without personal time to focus on what you need.

Between the travel days during the season and the long off-season, it seems likely that athletes have plenty of time to take care of their mental health.

However, when you are in public there really are no days off.

Famous athletes are often subject to as much media scrutiny and paparazzi nonsense as celebrities. Maintaining a social media presence is also a typical requirement today.

In addition, an athletic career requires constant training and work to stay in shape, even out of season.

All of this in addition to obligations for brand partnerships and personal philanthropic projects that many athletes take on create a schedule with very little time to rest.

To address this, Osaka suggested allowing athletes, like other professions in which they are exempt from media obligations, a small number of sick days.

“I think Naomi said it best,” said Christoferson. “Athletes should be given personal days and should not be expected to provide an answer as to why they need a ‘break’ to protect their own privacy and their lives away from the media and public viewers.”

However, this problem is addressed there Got to to be addressed somehow.

Mental health has become a big talk thanks to athletes like Osaka and fellow Olympian Michael Phelps, who is a mental health advocate for athletes, as well as people in the public eye like Meghan Markle.

Thanks to this and many other people, public awareness and sympathy for mental health is at an all-time high. Still, little seems to have changed so far.

Drastic steps need to be taken in society to support mental health issues – for all people of course, but during these Olympics athletes need to be part of the conversation more than ever.



source https://livehealthynews.com/respect-athletes-mental-health-needs-the-daily-evergreen/

Here’s How Climbing Actually Works At The Olympics

How will the competition work?

Climbing is carried out in two rounds for men and women: a qualification and a final. On August 3, 20 men will compete in qualifications that include speed climbing, bouldering and lead climbing with breaks between the disciplines. Eight of this round will advance to the final on August 5th. The women’s competition will start on August 4th and again 20 female athletes will compete against each other in the three disciplines on one day. The top eight will also reach the finals on August 6th.

How do the three disciplines work?

In climbing, each of the three disciplines – speed climbing, bouldering and lead climbing – is viewed as an independent event. A climber can take part in one or choose all three, it just depends on his preferences. Regardless of this, there is a winner for each category, whereby his performance in one discipline has no influence on the placement in another discipline.

At the Olympics, however, it won’t quite work that way. Instead, the Olympics are a composite format that tracks the athlete’s cumulative performance in all three disciplines. This has been heavily criticized because for most climbers it doesn’t necessarily mean they are good at one discipline, another. It’s like asking a marathon runner to run over 100 meters. In view of the criticism, climbing was confirmed for the 2024 Summer Olympics in Paris, where two sets of medals are awarded per gender: one for speed climbing and one for lead climbing / bouldering. But this is how the combination of disciplines works for Tokyo 2020.

Speed ​​climbing will take place on a standardized 15m route that uses the same holds and layout every time, so climbers can practice on the exact route they will be taking all year round. It is done with a rope and the goal is to get from the bottom to the top as quickly as possible. At the Olympic Games, it is held as a bracket tournament in which two climbers head to head against each other to advance to the next round until a winner is determined. Interestingly, the Olympics decided that a false start (where an athlete leaves the ground before the start buzzer) leads to immediate disqualification.

Bouldering will be on a 4.5m wall with a number of bouldering issues, four in qualifying and three in the final. When climbing without a rope, participants have four minutes to complete one task and then take a short break before moving on to the next task. Having never seen these problems before, athletes can make multiple attempts during the four-minute time limit. The grips, wall angles, and movements will be different for each boulder, based on technical sequences and parkour-style gymnastics. Points are awarded for reaching the top of each boulder and reaching the target grip with both hands while maintaining control. If the climber cannot reach the summit, points are awarded for reaching the marked “Zone” stop about halfway up.

Each climber’s score is as follows: 2T 2Z, which means she has made two top holds and two zone holds. In the event of a tie after the determination of the results, the number of attempts for each top hold or the number of attempts for each zone hold is taken into account, with the athlete who has made fewer attempts being awarded the higher rank.

Lead takes place on a 15 m long wall with a unique route that the athletes have no prior knowledge of. Athletes are given a six-minute prior session to see the route before the competition begins. The lead discipline uses a rope and requires the climber to develop technical motion sequences and to have the stamina to stay on the wall for a longer period of time. With a total of 40 to 60 holds, each hold is worth one point and climbers only have one attempt. If they fall, their turn is over. The highest number of points is placed in 1st place, the second highest in 2nd place, and so on. A tie is broken by giving the better rank to the person who climbed the same grip faster.

How is a medal winner determined?

The combined format for the Olympic Games means that every climber must participate in all three disciplines at the same time. You are given a ranking list for each, then these are added together to determine a final number. The lowest total then wins gold. For example, if you finish 1st in bouldering, 4th in lead and 18th in speed. Place occupied, receives a score of 1 x 4 x 18 = 72.

If you want to try climbing with all that climbing, check out our roundup of the best indoor climbing facilities below.

The 10 best indoor climbing gyms in Sydney

The 10 best indoor climbing gyms in Sydney



source https://livehealthynews.com/heres-how-climbing-actually-works-at-the-olympics/

Thursday, July 22, 2021

Black Women’s Health Advocates Applaud Legislation to Address the Uterine Fibroid Crisis

“Uterine fibroids are a health threat that urgently requires research, resources and improved treatment options.”

Tweet that

Uterine fibroids, benign tumors that grow in the uterus and range from the size of a pea to a football or larger, affect an estimated 26 million American women between the ages of 15 and 50. Black women, who are most affected by fibroids, are nearly three times as likely to be diagnosed as white women and with more severe symptoms leading to increased hospital stays and infertility.

“There aren’t enough data to understand why black women have uterine fibroids more often and with more severe complications,” said Linda Goler Blount, President and CEO of the Health Imperative for Black Women (BWHI). “Uterine fibroids are a health threat that requires urgent research, community resources and improved treatment options to maintain fertility. BWHI supports this legislation because it increases funding for uterine fibroid research and leads to new evidence-based treatments and cures for women of color. ”

“The introduction of the Stephanie Tubbs Jones Uterine Myoma Research and Education Act of 2021 is a monumental step for women and girls everywhere,” said Tanika Gray Valbrun, Founder and CEO of The White Dress Project. “There is still a lot of work to be done to address the uterine fibroid crisis. We need more education, more research and the full commitment of our policy makers to address health inequalities and understand why fibroids are disproportionately affecting black women.”

In addition to increasing funding for research, the Senate bipartisan bill would coordinate data collection on services for women with uterine fibroid symptoms, create a public education program to disseminate information on the incidence and prevalence of uterine fibroids in women – particularly with a focus on the increased risk in black women – and the treatment options available.

Both health initiatives will appear virtually on Capitol Hill along with the Society for Women’s Health Research July 27, 2021, which brings together patients and doctors from across the country on Speak Up Day to call for the Stephanie Tubbs Jones Uterine Fibroid Research and Education Act of 2021 to be passed. This advocacy day coincides with the close of Myoma Awareness Month.

About the Health Imperative for Black Women:

Originally founded as the National Black Women’s Health Project in 1983, BWHI is the only national not-for-profit organization dedicated to improving the health and wellbeing of our country’s 21 million black women and girls – physically, emotionally, and financially. Our core task is to promote equal health opportunities and social justice for black women across their entire lifespan through politics, advocacy, education, research and leadership development. Further information is available at www.bwhi.org.

About the White Dress Project:

The White Dress Project is a patient advocacy organization committed to raising global awareness of the uterine fibroid (UF) epidemic through education, research, community and advocacy. We accomplish this mission by promoting research funding, highlighting reproductive health inequalities, educating many about fibroids and their treatment options, and strengthening a community that is committed to their best health choices and no longer suffers in silence with this chronic disease. www.thewhitedressproject.org.

Media contact (s):
Priscilla Clarke, Health imperative for black women, (202) 723-2200
Amber English Coleman, The White Dress Project, (612) 554-5705

SOURCE Health imperative for black women Black

similar links

https://bwhi.org/



source https://livehealthynews.com/black-womens-health-advocates-applaud-legislation-to-address-the-uterine-fibroid-crisis/

Great Health Divide | Stocking stores to supply SNAP beneficiaries

POMEROY, oh. (WSAZ) – In 2018, more than 4,800 people in Meigs County, Ohio used SNAP services.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the federal government’s largest nutritional assistance program.

SNAP offers benefits to eligible individuals and low-income families through an electronic benefit transfer card.

This card can be used like a debit card to purchase eligible groceries from authorized grocery stores.

The Food Fair in Pomeroy is the only full-service grocery store within miles.

“I’d rather come here than go to Athens every day,” said Miranda Long, a buyer.

There are convenience stores and dollar chains nearby, but these are usually not stocked with healthier food options.

“When it comes to fresh fruit and vegetables, there is no substitute for the traditional supermarket,” says Tim Forth, owner of Food Fair.

Forth and the Powell family saved the Pomeroy grocery store when it was due to close years ago. If it wasn’t nearby, residents would have to drive more than 30 minutes to the nearest grocery store.

Miranda Long stopped by to pick up a few items for her son’s birthday party. She says it’s always stocked with supplies as well as healthy and nutritious foods.

Food Fair is one of the few local shops in the area that accepts the benefits of SNAP and WIC. To become a trader who accepts these programs, you must go through an application and selection process.

“You have to have a certain amount of product to even qualify for WIC,” said Forth.

Many who take advantage of SNAP try to stretch those dollars as much as possible, which is not always easy.

“I think it’s a little more expensive to eat healthier,” Long said.

Tim Forth says grocery stores sell a larger amount of healthier food, which gives them a competitive price advantage.

“Traditional supermarkets have so much more choice,” said Forth. “Regarding various objects; Regardless of whether you want organic or something with a little more value, there is only a large selection. “

Many agree that more education could help beneficiaries and benefit recipients better understand the value of healthy, nutritious foods. Working parents may have difficulty finding the time or energy to prepare adequate and balanced meals for their family. Others may not know how to incorporate fruits and vegetables into cooking recipes.

“We can educate the public about healthy alternatives and healthy living,” said Forth. “It just pays off; lower medical costs, healthier children. “

The pandemic also put certain products and stocks under pressure, sometimes making shelves difficult to stock. Forth says it’s a responsibility they don’t take lightly.

“When we run out or have trouble getting supplies,” Forth said. “It’s a life changing event for the people of Meigs County.”

Not only are most of the products locally sourced, but the workforce is as well, and a few simple changes would benefit the entire community and every family that hugs them.

Copyright 2021 WSAZ. All rights reserved.



source https://livehealthynews.com/great-health-divide-stocking-stores-to-supply-snap-beneficiaries/